Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The Paramilitarization of Mexico

Mexico's first paramilitary "self defense" group: Mata Zeta (Zeta killers).

Politics abhors a vacuum. When the state loses the capacity to provide security for its citizens, they commonly seek to provide it for themselves. This basic fact of politics plays out time after time in weak and failing states. In Colombia, for example, during the 1980s and in response a growing, drug-fuelled insurgency, a group called "Muerte a Secuestradores," (Death to Kidnappers) was formed. It quickly blossomed into a full blown paramilitary movement that in most respects is a bigger threat to the Colombian state than even the guerrillas.

Mexico is not a failed state, or even a "weak" state by most standards. This Mata Zeta group may be an isolated phenomenon, or it may be symptomatic of the decline of the state's monopoly of violence. Some might applaud the initiative of the Zeta Killers. If the latter, we might expect the movement of Mexican "self defense." Of course, armed groups do not get far without funding, organization, and followers. The temptation of any armed group would be to prey upon the drug trade, as did the Colombian paramilitaries. In the end, they became just another self-interested movement playing the politics and economics of civil war.



Of course, it still remains to be seen whether Mata Zeta is a real paramilitary group. Some speculate it could be a covert government operation; others say it might be rival drug gang.

3 comments:

  1. "... symptomatic of the state's (of Mexico) monopoly of violence."
    errrr, when did this start?
    It seems to me, at least in the last 15-20 years, that Mexico's "monopoly" on violence has been seriously challenged by the black market representatives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually that probably started in about 2007.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I said "decline" of the state's monopoly on violence. That is, the state faced few "internal challengers" to state authority before the rise of violent drug trafficking in about 2007. Compared to countries like Peru and Colombia that have never really had this monopoly, and have always faced some sort of internal violent challenge.

    ReplyDelete